General Guidelines for Peer Reviewing Creative Works

 


1. Read

Read through the story, poem, or essay once before making any comments on peer sheets or manuscript. For this first reading, you are simply reading as if you were picking up a magazine or short story or poetry collection – in short, a casual reading.

 

2. Think

Take a few minutes to think about what you have just read.

 

3. Write

On a separate piece of paper (not on the writer’s manuscript), jot down your preliminary impressions (which you may or may not be sharing with the author), e.g. “I don’t like stories or poems about baseball, so I didn’t like this one” or “I didn’t like the grandmother as a person” or “I just love the religious overtones of the piece.” The idea is to get past “personal biases” and “agendas” and get on with offering the author a fair critique based on craft, not personal tastes on the part of the reviewer.

 

4. Reread

Read the piece again, this time, as you read, jotting down comments on a separate piece of paper. If you discover that you don’t like the piece no matter how many times you read it, try to figure out why. For example, does the story or poem need technical work, or do you have a personal aversion to style, a character, theme, etc.? If so, let the writer know about your biases.

 

5. Answer Questions

Now look over your notes and answer the questions from the appropriate genre list, for example, Fiction: Peer or Self Reviewing a Short Story

 

6. Write a Constructive Critique

Write a constructive critique of the piece. At this point, you may jot down notes on the author’s manuscript. Begin your critique by accentuating the positive. When discussing weaknesses, do so in a spirit of professional respect and a willingness to be helpful. Be honest, but write in a thoughtful and considerate manner – the way that you would want your work to be critiqued. And give the author your best shot!

 

7. Offer the Critique to the Writer.

When you are finished, distribute the critique, peer list, and manuscript to the author.

 

8. Offer the Writer the Opportunity to Ask Questions.

Offer the writer time to read over your critique, and be prepared for questions and requests for clarification.

 

__________________

 

A slightly different version of this article appears on the author’s academic website AcademicDesk.org 


Comments

Jennifer's Cloud

Anger Anne Bernays Antagonist Apollo 8 Articles and Resources Banner Credit Beginning Bio Blogs Call for "Why I Write" Essays Call for Submissions Catholic Church Character List Characterization Cherokee Iowa Cherokee Mental Institute Climax Conflict Contact Contact Jen Contact Jennifer Controversy Creative Writing Curriculum Vitae CV: Education CV: Employment CV: Honors and Awards CV: Offices and Memberships CV: Professional Activities CV: PUblications Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje Description Details Dialogue Drama Dramady Dynamic Characters Earth Earthrise Elements of Fiction Elements of Fiction: Character List Elements of Fiction: Characterization Elements of Fiction: Other Elements Elements of Fiction: Point of View Elements of Fiction: Structure Elements of Nonfiction Epiphany Essay Essay Review Essays Falling Action Family Drama Family Reunion Fiction Fiction Review Fiction: Peer or Self Review of a Short Story Fire First Person Formal Essay Frank McCourt Free Verse Fulbright Scholar General Guidelines for Peer Reviewing Creative Works Ghosts Hey Hey little trollie Hippies Homelessness Humor Informal Essay Involuntary Commitment Iowa Ironclad Rules Ironclad Rules for Creative Writing Jeff Jeffer Jeffer.co Jeffer.me Jennifer Jennifer Semple Siegel Jennifer's Blogs Jennifer's Books Jennifer's Sites Jennifer's Story Journal Journaling Journaling or Memoiring: Private Vs. Public Writing Letters Long Short Story Love marriage Memoir Memoir Madness: Driven to Involuntary Commitment Memoir Review Memoirist Memoirs Mental Institutions Messages Monologue My Name is (Also) Jeffer Name Names Narrative Nonfiction NASA Non-fiction Non-fiction Review Non-fiction: Self or Peer Review of a Personal Essay or Memoir nonfiction North Macedonia Not-so-great Poetry Obsessions Pamela Painter Peer Review Pems Personal Essay Photo Credit – NASA Play Plot Poem Poems Poetry Poetry review Poetry: How Not to Send Out a Poem Poetry: Self or Peer Review of a Poem Point of View Primary Characters Privacy and Copyright Notice Private Writing Protagonist Public Writing Puns Reality Play Reality T.V. Resolution/Dénouement Résumé Review Rhetorical Nonfiction Rising action Rules Scene Scope Second Person Secondary Characters Self Review Setting Sexuality Short Bio Short Stories Short Story Short Story Collection Short Story Review Show Simple Rules Sites Skopje Static Characters Story Structure Summary Telling Tense The Politics of Memoir The Politics of Memoir and the Making of Memoir Madness The Trash Can of L.A.: A Reality Play Thematic Sites Theme Themes Third Person Third Person Limited Third Person Omniscient Third Person Singular Three Basic Rules Tone Trollie Trolls Weight Weight Issues What If? Why I Write Why YOU Write Writer Writers Writing Writing Purpose
Show more

Privacy and Copyright Notice

Photo Credit – NASA


The banner on this site has been created from one of the most iconic photos in modern history: Earthrise as viewed from the Moon. More